<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Singularity Summit - Day 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consideringtheuniverse.com/blog/singularity-summit-day-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consideringtheuniverse.com/blog/singularity-summit-day-2/</link>
	<description>...and your place in it.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lolcats</title>
		<link>http://www.consideringtheuniverse.com/blog/singularity-summit-day-2/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>Lolcats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 19:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consideringtheuniverse.com/blog/singularity-summit-day-2/#comment-234</guid>
		<description>I think mind uploading would be amazing. Even if it was just for personal use (like a yearbook for that point in my life). 

I think the creation of applications that combine social networks is a step toward singularity and AI. It makes the entire internet available in one window.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think mind uploading would be amazing. Even if it was just for personal use (like a yearbook for that point in my life). </p>
<p>I think the creation of applications that combine social networks is a step toward singularity and AI. It makes the entire internet available in one window.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emily</title>
		<link>http://www.consideringtheuniverse.com/blog/singularity-summit-day-2/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consideringtheuniverse.com/blog/singularity-summit-day-2/#comment-106</guid>
		<description>That's a great point, Matt. I think that you're right about AI and the internet being heavily, if not completely, intertwined. Hopefully, the AI will be able to experience humanity outside of the internet as well. The last thing we need is a super-intelligent porn addict.

A few speakers at the Singularity Summit touched on the need for humanity to continue to improve itself in preparation for the Singularity. If we had an evolutionary type of AI that learned like a human child, we would presumably want to be the best parents possible. In my mind that would mean treating other people and animals with kindness in hopes that the AI would adopt those characteristics. I think this idea also applies to alien life. If aliens were to observe humans treating each other terribly, they might conclude that we are not a very nice species and should be eliminated before we colonize other planets. Who knows? 

I think that whether the future holds AI, aliens, the second coming of Christ or any number of things we can't even conceive of, the more loving and content we are individually, the better everything will turn out. We have a much better chance of a friendly Singularity if we have a friendly world to welcome it into.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a great point, Matt. I think that you&#8217;re right about AI and the internet being heavily, if not completely, intertwined. Hopefully, the AI will be able to experience humanity outside of the internet as well. The last thing we need is a super-intelligent porn addict.</p>
<p>A few speakers at the Singularity Summit touched on the need for humanity to continue to improve itself in preparation for the Singularity. If we had an evolutionary type of AI that learned like a human child, we would presumably want to be the best parents possible. In my mind that would mean treating other people and animals with kindness in hopes that the AI would adopt those characteristics. I think this idea also applies to alien life. If aliens were to observe humans treating each other terribly, they might conclude that we are not a very nice species and should be eliminated before we colonize other planets. Who knows? </p>
<p>I think that whether the future holds AI, aliens, the second coming of Christ or any number of things we can&#8217;t even conceive of, the more loving and content we are individually, the better everything will turn out. We have a much better chance of a friendly Singularity if we have a friendly world to welcome it into.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Shultz</title>
		<link>http://www.consideringtheuniverse.com/blog/singularity-summit-day-2/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Shultz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consideringtheuniverse.com/blog/singularity-summit-day-2/#comment-105</guid>
		<description>I don't think the tendency for military research budgets to push the boundaries of technology outward is going to abate any time soon. The near future features, I fear, armies that are composed mostly of killer robots, remote controlled from the homeland. We already have the beginning of this, with predators and, more recently, &lt;a href="http://www.defensereview.com/modules.php?name=News&#38;file=article&#38;sid=704" rel="nofollow"&gt;SWORDs&lt;/a&gt;. Soldiers will just be guys sitting back in easy chairs, playing computer games that kill people. 

On a different note, I come at the issue of instilling friendlies in AI from a bit of a contrary perspective. I don't think it will be necessary, because whatever posthuman entity comes next won't be a pure descendant of AI. Let me put it this way: the internet has already become the manifest collective subconcious of our species, a sort of shared mental prosthesis that has been indelibly marked by our influence (see: 6 million cat pictures, god knows how many billions of female anatomy). Now, the first AI is almost certain to be a creature of the internet. It may even become the internet, or the internet may become it (for instance, if one of the Singularity Institute's seed AIs gets loose). If growing directly out of the shared experience of humanity doesn't produce an entity that would prefer to keep us around out of some sort of filial piety, we don't deserve to survive as a species.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the tendency for military research budgets to push the boundaries of technology outward is going to abate any time soon. The near future features, I fear, armies that are composed mostly of killer robots, remote controlled from the homeland. We already have the beginning of this, with predators and, more recently, <a href="http://www.defensereview.com/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=704" rel="nofollow">SWORDs</a>. Soldiers will just be guys sitting back in easy chairs, playing computer games that kill people. </p>
<p>On a different note, I come at the issue of instilling friendlies in AI from a bit of a contrary perspective. I don&#8217;t think it will be necessary, because whatever posthuman entity comes next won&#8217;t be a pure descendant of AI. Let me put it this way: the internet has already become the manifest collective subconcious of our species, a sort of shared mental prosthesis that has been indelibly marked by our influence (see: 6 million cat pictures, god knows how many billions of female anatomy). Now, the first AI is almost certain to be a creature of the internet. It may even become the internet, or the internet may become it (for instance, if one of the Singularity Institute&#8217;s seed AIs gets loose). If growing directly out of the shared experience of humanity doesn&#8217;t produce an entity that would prefer to keep us around out of some sort of filial piety, we don&#8217;t deserve to survive as a species.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
