<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Responsibility and Super Intelligence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consideringtheuniverse.com/blog/social-responsibility-and-super-intelligence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consideringtheuniverse.com/blog/social-responsibility-and-super-intelligence/</link>
	<description>...and your place in it.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt Shultz</title>
		<link>http://www.consideringtheuniverse.com/blog/social-responsibility-and-super-intelligence/#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Shultz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consideringtheuniverse.com/blog/social-responsibility-and-super-intelligence/#comment-444</guid>
		<description>I got into Orion's Arm a few years ago, and I confess it consumed me for a month or so. They've built something beautiful there. It's probably the most detailed example of world building in all of science fiction. It consistently amazes me that it isn't better known amongst sci-fi geeks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got into Orion&#8217;s Arm a few years ago, and I confess it consumed me for a month or so. They&#8217;ve built something beautiful there. It&#8217;s probably the most detailed example of world building in all of science fiction. It consistently amazes me that it isn&#8217;t better known amongst sci-fi geeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emily</title>
		<link>http://www.consideringtheuniverse.com/blog/social-responsibility-and-super-intelligence/#comment-442</link>
		<dc:creator>emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consideringtheuniverse.com/blog/social-responsibility-and-super-intelligence/#comment-442</guid>
		<description>We're always so happy to have your perspective, Matt. I totally related to the boredom factor you mentioned. The idea of a supermind of collective uploaded brains is really interesting too. I hadn't thought about that before. 

Orion's Arm looks a little complex for me to digest this morning, but I'm always happy to learn about odd stuff on the internet. Man, I really love the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re always so happy to have your perspective, Matt. I totally related to the boredom factor you mentioned. The idea of a supermind of collective uploaded brains is really interesting too. I hadn&#8217;t thought about that before. </p>
<p>Orion&#8217;s Arm looks a little complex for me to digest this morning, but I&#8217;m always happy to learn about odd stuff on the internet. Man, I really love the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Shultz</title>
		<link>http://www.consideringtheuniverse.com/blog/social-responsibility-and-super-intelligence/#comment-441</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Shultz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consideringtheuniverse.com/blog/social-responsibility-and-super-intelligence/#comment-441</guid>
		<description>Speaking from experience, I think the main thing that keeps people in different IQ brackets from talking to each other comes down to boredom. Smart people get bored very quickly, talking to dumb people, because the ideas and concepts that stimulate their minds are incomprehensible to lesser intellects. Likewise, dumb people are generally most interested in the lower regions of Maslow's Hierarchy, things like sports and sex, which more intelligent people often find incredibly dull. What further amplifies this is that you almost don't even have to talk to someone to know how smart they are, and whether they're worth talking to or not; just looking in their eyes is often enough to gauge their intelligence. 

This isn't a problem to which there's any easy solution, in the short term. Long-term (well, as long-term as any discussion of the Singularity can really be), I can see two ways in which serious issues of social cohesion might be avoided. One is through network effects: it could be that the Wilburian oversoul grows out of the networked sum of all mechanical and biological compution, such that entities at every level are direct participants. Another would be through the ability of entities to move through sophic levels: a human might upgrade his mind through chemical or computation intelligence augmentation, then upload to a computer, then further amplify his cognitive power through expansion inside the artificial substrate. In this model, the post-human entities at the top end would view the swarm of lesser entities at the lower as being akin to their children (or perhaps zygotes would be a better analogy), thus encouraging a more or less benevolent outlook.

For a science-fictional outlook on how this might play out, check out Orion's Arm, a collaborative world-building project where the world has become so ridiculously overgrown that any possibility of decent fiction growing out of it is completely eclipsed (which I'm cool with, actually. In this case, the world itself is the art-work.) 

http://www.orionsarm.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking from experience, I think the main thing that keeps people in different IQ brackets from talking to each other comes down to boredom. Smart people get bored very quickly, talking to dumb people, because the ideas and concepts that stimulate their minds are incomprehensible to lesser intellects. Likewise, dumb people are generally most interested in the lower regions of Maslow&#8217;s Hierarchy, things like sports and sex, which more intelligent people often find incredibly dull. What further amplifies this is that you almost don&#8217;t even have to talk to someone to know how smart they are, and whether they&#8217;re worth talking to or not; just looking in their eyes is often enough to gauge their intelligence. </p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t a problem to which there&#8217;s any easy solution, in the short term. Long-term (well, as long-term as any discussion of the Singularity can really be), I can see two ways in which serious issues of social cohesion might be avoided. One is through network effects: it could be that the Wilburian oversoul grows out of the networked sum of all mechanical and biological compution, such that entities at every level are direct participants. Another would be through the ability of entities to move through sophic levels: a human might upgrade his mind through chemical or computation intelligence augmentation, then upload to a computer, then further amplify his cognitive power through expansion inside the artificial substrate. In this model, the post-human entities at the top end would view the swarm of lesser entities at the lower as being akin to their children (or perhaps zygotes would be a better analogy), thus encouraging a more or less benevolent outlook.</p>
<p>For a science-fictional outlook on how this might play out, check out Orion&#8217;s Arm, a collaborative world-building project where the world has become so ridiculously overgrown that any possibility of decent fiction growing out of it is completely eclipsed (which I&#8217;m cool with, actually. In this case, the world itself is the art-work.) </p>
<p><a href="http://www.orionsarm.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.orionsarm.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
